The impact of replacing plastics packaging

A new written report by Franklin Associates enquiry for the American Chemistry Council builds on and reaffirms a 2014 study that replacing plastics packaging with other substitutes would have astringent adverse ecology impact.

The American Chemical science Council, one of the globe's most authoritative and respected industry associations, has released a new study that reaffirms that trying to supercede plastics packaging with substitute materials is fraught with severe adverse impacts on the environment due to significant increases in material usage, energy used, water consumption, solid waste, greenhouse gas emissions, ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophicationⁱ and global warming potential.

In research commissioned by the American Chemistry Council and carried out by Franklin Associates, the new study builds on an before study carried out in 2014 by the same agency and uses established information on the free energy and GHG benefits of plastics compared to alternatives. According to Steve Russell, vice president of plastics, American Chemistry Council. "It expands our understanding of critical ecology benefits across free energy and highlights key environmental indicators similar water employ and waste generation." The written report summarizes that looking at the United States data alone, when compared to alternatives, production, employ and disposal of plastic packaging across the six major packaging segments studied per year saves:

– plenty free energy to fuel 18 1000000 rider vehicles;

– enough water to fill 461,000 Olympic swimming pools;

– waste equivalent to the weight of 290,000 Boeing 747 airplanes; and,

– the acidification potential of 292,000 railcars of coal.

"The findings challenge common misperceptions around plastics and underscore that plastic is a versatile efficient material that is helping to solve some of our greatest environmental challenges. However, we tin't realize its full benefits if we don't work toward amend end-of-life solutions," said Russell. ACC and Due north American resin producers established a goal that 100% of plastic packaging will be reused, recycled or recovered past 2040. Meeting this goal and eliminating plastic waste material in our ocean will further improve the environmental performance of plastic packaging. We all desire a world without plastic pollution, just nosotros wouldn't want a earth without plastic."

The 2014 study

The 2014 report was an elaborate exercise using Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) methodology and focused on plastics packaging used in the USA and Canada. The materials studied were all the major thermoplastic resins used, every bit follows:

– Depression-Density Polyethylene (LDPE)

– High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE)

– Polypropylene (PP)

– Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)

– Polystyrene (PS)

– Expanded Polystyrene (EPS)

– Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)

Other resins, including specialty copolymers, biopolymers and others were not included.

Culling materials that substitute plastic packaging included: steel – aluminum, glass, paper-based packaging including corrugated lath, packaging paper, cardboard (both coated and uncoated), molded fiber, paper-based composites and laminates, cobweb-based textiles, and wood. Substitutes for plastic packaging varied depending on the market sector and packaging application. Cork and safe were included as substitutes only in the caps and closures category.

The LCA focused on plastic packaging applications and the plastic materials which are substitutable by culling materials. The packaging sector was divided into the following 6 major packaging segments that deemed for the bulk of packaging market by weight of materials used –

– Other rigid packaging (includes the subcategories non-bulk rigid packaging, rigid protective packaging, and rigid bulk packaging)

– Other flexible packaging (includes the subcategories converted flexible packaging, flexible protective packaging, and flexible bulk packaging)

– Beverage packaging

– Carrier bags

– Shrink and stretch film

– Caps and closures

The following life wheel stages were included for each packaging material application:

1. Raw material production of the packaging materials, which consists of all steps from resource extraction through raw fabric production, including all transportation.

2. Fabrication of the packaging from their raw materials and the subsequent transportation of empty packaging from the fabrication site to the commodity filling site.

3. Distribution send of commodity and packaging from the commodity filling site to a the use site (focusing on differences in impacts due to packaging itself).

4. Post-consumer disposal of packaging in a landfill or waste-to-free energy incineration, and/or

5. Recycling of packaging, including transport from the apply site to recycling facilities, where applicable.

The catamenia diagram of boundaries is given in Fig.ane'

Approximately a 3rd of plastics production goes into plastics packaging (this was the 2014 scenario; the figure now is well-nigh 40%).

Findings of the 2014 study

Expended Free energy is defined as Cumulative Energy Need less the energy embedded in the materials and is available for recycling etc. (this is loftier for plastics).

The amount of materials used by plastics is fourteen.four million MT and this goes up to 64 million MT for substitutes.

Decision

Despite the popular misconceptions that abound nigh Plastics Packaging, they are by far more sustainable than substitute materials and consume much less scarce material resources, energy and water. z

¹ Eutrophication (from Greek eutrophos, 'well-nourished'), or hypertrophication, is when a body of water becomes overly enriched with minerals and nutrients that induce excessive growth of plants and algae. This process may effect in oxygen depletion of the water torso. Eutrophication is characterized by excessive constitute and algal growth due to the increased availability of ane or more limiting growth factors needed for photosynthesis (Schindler 2006), such as sunlight, carbon dioxide, and nutrient fertilizers.

As yous join usa today from India and elsewhere, we have a favour to ask. Through these times of ambiguity and claiming, the packaging industry in India and in most parts of the world has been fortunate. We are now read in more than than 90 countries every bit our coverage widens and increases in impact. Our traffic as per analytics more than doubled in 2022 and many readers chose to support us financially even when advertising cruel to pieces.

As we come out of the pandemic in the adjacent few months, nosotros promise to again aggrandize our geography and evolve our high-impact reporting and authoritative and technical information, with some of the all-time correspondents in the industry. If there were ever a time to support us, it is now. You lot tin can ability Packaging South asia's balanced industry journalism and help to sustain us by subscribing.

Subscribe At present

kochonamix.blogspot.com

Source: https://packagingsouthasia.com/she-safety-health-and-environment/sustainability-health/the-impact-of-replacing-plastics-packaging/

Share this post